Category: Periodic commentary

ETFMathGuy provides periodic commentary on risks and opportunities of investing in Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), including recent market trends.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription based education service providing commission-free ETF optimal portfolios. We offer individual investors insights into building optimal portfolios.  Each month, we analyze hundreds of commission-free ETFs available to individual investors.  Then, we build optimal portfolios based on a variety of risk tolerances and current market conditions using a quantitative methodology.

We hope these periodic commentaries on ETFs help you improve your investment knowledge!

Posted on

Mid-year review of stock-based ETFs

With the 1st half of 2022 now behind us, we devote this post to a mid-year review of ETFs in a variety of stock sectors. We also highlight some recent research on sectors that have historically held up well during periods of high inflation, and the benefit of time horizon when investing in stocks. We hope you find this mid-year review helpful!

Record-breaking 1st half of 2022

According to this MarketWatch article, the S&P 500 recorded its steepest 1st-half year loss in over 50 years. But, remember that the S&P 500 is a broad-based index consisting of many different companies across a variety of industries. In fact, there are 11 sectors in the S&P 500, which in order of size (and an ETF to represent them) are:

  • Information Technology (XLK)
  • Health Care (XLV)
  • Financials (XLF)
  • Consumer Discretionary (XLY)
  • Communication Services (XTL)
  • Industrials (XLI)
  • Consumer Staples (XLP)
  • Energy (XLE)
  • Utilities (XLU)
  • Real Estate (IYR)
  • Materials (XLB)

Mid-year review of best and worst performing sector ETFs

The chart below sorts the total return for the 11 ETFs identified above for 2022. As can be seen here, the biggest gains were among the energy sector (XLE) and the worst in consumer discretionary (XLY). Over this same period, the S&P 500 total return, measured by the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (ticker: IVV) was -19.2%. Also, note that the energy sector was the only ETF here that saw a positive return, which is not surprising given the war in Ukraine and its impact on supply in the energy sector.

Mid-year review of returns from 11 sector-ETFs in the S&P 500 Index
Mid-year review of returns from 11 sector-ETFs in the S&P 500 Index

Where will stocks go from here and what to do about it?

Given the current high inflation rates, Derek Horstmeyer at George Mason University recently showed the following “inflation fighters” in his June 5th Wall Street Journal Article.

Best performing sectors during periods of high inflation. Source: Derek Horstmeyer
Best performing sectors during periods of high inflation. Source: Derek Horstmeyer

Of course, the most prudent course of action may be to simply do nothing based on this mid-year review. Given longer investment horizons, the stock market is less likely to suffer losses. Based on Bank of America research, the chart below supports this fact.

But, as this article notes, behavioral economists know that the pain of loss is greater than the pleasure of gains. So, the 2nd half of this year remains quite uncertain, as market volatility remains elevated.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs
Posted on

Tax-efficient retirement and upcoming webinar

Greetings ETFMathGuy subscribers! In this post, I will introduce you to our updated interactive calculator for tax-efficient retirement planning.

tax-efficient investing with the Optimal Retirement Income Calculator by ETFMathGuy
Optimal Retirement Income Calculator by ETFMathGuy
Note:  This post has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.

Tax-Efficient Retirement

We moved the retirement income calculator location on our site. Updated for 2022 tax law, it provides insights into the following questions:

  • How long will my portfolio support my annual after-tax retirement income needed to support discretionary and non-discretionary expenses?
  • How much will my heir or favorite charitable organization receive?
  • What will my future tax liabilities look like?

We still assume a mixture of tax-efficient investing in stock and bond ETFs, like IVV and AGG. Specifically, we assumed ETF stock investments generate qualified dividends and ETF bond investments generate dividends taxed as ordinary income. Of course, these assumption are only relevant to taxable account assets held by a retiree. Retiree’s may incur income taxes when they withdraw assets from tax-deferred accounts, like 401(k)s and rollover IRAs funded with pre-tax dollars. Tax-exempt accounts (like Roth IRAs) are generally not subject to any tax if withdrawn after age 59 1/2. The image below summarizes how we modeled different retirement income sources and how they contribute to after-tax income.

Modeling Retirement Taxes in Our Retirement Income Calculator

What’s new?

We now offer the ability to expedite calculations by storing profile data, such as month and day of birth to determine your first Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age, and state of residence for community property tax calculations. You can also find a “subscribe” button below your profile data. So, if after running the retirement calculator and viewing results from the Common Rule, you must subscribe if you are interested in seeing the details on the Modified Common Rule or Optimal Rule. For example, if you run the retirement income calculator with its default values, you will see the following information about your plan. But, only paid subscribers will be able to view future optimal drawdown decisions and other supporting information.

Default Retirement Income Calculator Results and Improvements Based on a Optimal Rule

Please note: You will need to register with us here for free and then confirm your email address with our new system. We have not transferred any previously provided email addresses, instead using them solely for distribution of this periodic commentary. We also plan for many additional upgrades and new calculators this year, as we discussed in our last post, or as you can see on our new home page.

Upcoming Webinar for Individual Investors and Financial Advisors

I will be presenting an in-depth review of this new online software, including details on how it is based on my latest research on tax-efficient investing, on Tuesday, March 1st at 9 am Pacific Time, 12:00 noon Eastern Time. Individual investors can register here, and financial advisors can register here. If you are unable to make the presentation, you are welcome to download my presentation here.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs
Posted on

Happy new year!

Happy new year from ETFMathGuy! In this post, we will provide some updates to our plans for 2022.

happy birthday to you wall decor
Photo by Anna Tarazevich on Pexels.com

New Priorities

As 2022 begins, we decided to reset our priorities for this website. Up until now, we provided the following services to our subscribers.

For 2022, we’ve decided that the cost to produce and maintain the free and premium portfolios was simply too high. We also recognized that, while these portfolios did exceed their objective in 2020, they did not in 2021. All premium subscribers will receive a pro-rated refund of their subscription payments shortly. In the meantime, free and premium subscribers can now access the final monthly portfolios, based on data through December 31, 2021.

Coming soon

So, after receiving very positive praise on our retirement calculator, we’ve decided to make improving it a priority. Also, thanks to significant feedback from individual investors and financial services professionals, below is a list of features we hope to provide in the near future:

  • Projection of retirement assets at beginning of retirement for pre-retiree planning
  • Optimized social security starting age for single or married couples
  • Medicare Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount  (IRMAA) tax
  • State taxes, as applicable
  • 3.8% medicare surtax
  • Roth conversions using either IRA or taxable account funds
  • Robustness checks with an automated sensitivity analysis for selectable uncertain variables
  • Risk assessment with simulation of uncertain stock market returns, life exptancy, after-tax income needs, and others
  • Real estate income and residual value
  • Support for Financial Independence, Retiree Early (FIRE)
  • Online storage of previous results for future reference

Of course, our retirement calculator already has many features discussed in the FAQ and listed at the top of the calculator. Also, if you are interested in greater details, you are welcome to download this whitepaper that we developed recently to describe the current model in greater depth.

We hope you have a wonderful 2022!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs
Posted on

Bitcoin ETFs may arrive soon, but returns may surprise ETF investors

Investor interest in cryptocurrency and bitcoin remains high. This week, ETF investors may see the first futures-based bitcoin ETFs. Here, we discuss the introduction of bitcoin ETFs, and why they may not perform as ETF investors expect.

person putting bitcoin in a piggy bank
Photo by Alesia Kozik on Pexels.com

Set to debut this week and next week

According to this ETF.com article, October 18th could be the first effective date that two bitcoin ETFs are set to debut. And, another bitcoin ETF could become available a week later, on October 23rd, and a fourth potentially available on October 25th. But, its important to note that each of these ETFs depend on futures contracts for their bitcoin exposure. Therefore, none of them hold bitcoin to provide direct exposure to the spot market. Instead, the most direct exposure for investors seeking bitcoin remains the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), which typically trades at a premium. In fact, we wrote about the risks and taxation of GBTC earlier this year.

What can happen with futures-based ETFs?

Sadly, futures-based ETFs can often not match the corresponding price performance of the spot market. For example, ETF investors wishing exposure to West Texas Intermediate crude oil price changes could buy the United States Oil Fund ETF (ticker: USO) Unfortunately, a phenomenan called “contango” can occur when the price of the futures contract exceeds the expected future spot price. So, the fund loses money when it replaces expiring contracts with near-term future contracts. Consequently, over time, futures-based ETFs tend to underperform the spot price market.

“These kinds of vehicles are primarily meant to be used by active traders to hedge or short positions.  They are not meant as long-term buy and hold vehicles.”

source: CNBC.com.

A better way to track bitcoin in an ETF

Fortunately, there is some good news about bitcoin ETFs. Greyscale has indicated it may convert its current bitcoin fund into an ETF. If they do, this ETF’s investment returns wouldn’t be subject to contango, and won’t suffer from the return drag of futures-based bitcoin ETFs. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) current commissioner has stated he prefers approving ETFs backed by bitcoin futures. So, ETF investors interested in bitcoin may wish to continue to wait or seek alternatives outside the ETF space.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.

Posted on

Backtesting for 2021 and ETFMathGuy portfolio enhancements

Due to portfolio performance not meeting our recent expectations, we revisited our backtesting results from August 2018 and produced important new insights and portfolio construction enhancements. We discovered that a longer sample period, identified previously, no longer applied. The image below shows that a three-month sample period produced the best returns from January 2020 to August 27, 2021. Each point on this line plot represents annualized backtested performance for 19 monthly portfolios over this testing period.

Backtesting for 2021 to find the optimal sample period (months) for ETFMathGuy Portfolio Construction
Backtesting for 2021 to find the optimal sample period (months) for ETFMathGuy Portfolio Construction

What performance predictions occurred with this shorter sample period?

Using this shorter sample period, we produced the plot below of total return since January of 2020. We chose this time period to include the full pre and post-term effects of the coronavirus on the world economy. In addition, and based on subscriber feedback, we now exclude ETFs that issue K-1 tax forms to investors. We made this decision because these 22 ETFs had a marginal effect on backtested performance that used over 1,000 other ETFs that do not issue K-1s. We also increased our ETF filter threshold of median volume to improve liquidity for future portfolios that will likely have a higher turnover rate. The consequences of these decisions on backtested performance appear below.

Backtested Returns from 2020-2021 of the ETFMathGuy Optimal Portfolios
Backtested Returns from 2020-2021 of the ETFMathGuy Optimal Portfolios

Future ETFMathGuy portfolios

Given the improvement potential identified from this updated backtesting for 2021, all portfolios published in September 2021 and later will follow these updated findings. This update for the September portfolios will likely indicate a significant change from the August portfolios. However, future monthly portfolios will change less significantly. So, we encourage subscribers to log in and see the September ETFMathGuy portfolios that are based on this evidence-based analysis.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Recap of the first half of 2021

Greeting ETFMathGuy subscribers! This post is a reminder that the latest free and premium optimal portfolios are now available for your review. So, please log in and see how the latest market conditions have affected these ETF portfolios. To begin, we discuss value versus growth ETFs and recent trends in their returns.

Recent returns on value investing leveling off?

A few months ago, we wrote about how value-driven ETFs returned about 5% more in the first quarter than growth ETFs. Revisiting the returns of the ETFs IVV, VUG, and VTV for the first half of 2021 shows this gap has shrunk to 3% after growing to more than 10%. In fact, as the chart here shows, the value ETF is below its early May high, while the growth ETF appears to have begun a new upward trend.

Total returns of value and growth ETFs.
The total return of value and growth ETFs in the first half of 2021. Source: www.ETFReplay.com

Is the relationship between value and growth ETFs typical?

The relationship between two variables can be directly measured using correlation which varies between 1 and -1. So, a correlation of 1 between two investment returns indicates their returns are identical. Traditionally, the correlation between value and growth investments was around 75%. However, as this Wall Street Journal article highlights, the current correlation between growth and value is now below 25%.

Correlation between value and growth returns.
Source: Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2021, by James Mackintosh

Performance of the ETFMathGuy Premium Portfolios

Based on actual investment performance, the risk and return of the moderate and aggressive portfolios over the last 18 months appear below. Consequently, this period includes all of the calendar year 2020, and the first half of 2021.

ModerateAggressiveS&P 500 (IVV)
volatility (risk, annualized)19.5%22.5%21.2%
total return23.9%32.7%36.4%
Annualized risk and total return of the ETFMathGuy portfolios, 2020-2021 (18 months).

We will continue to update our ETFMathGuy portfolios with current market conditions using our updated backtesting calibration results. So, time will tell if value ETF investing continues to outperform growth ETF investing.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Backtesting ETF portfolios

Backtesting ETF portfolios is a very important part of validating any investment strategy that uses them. At ETFMathGuy, we backtest our optimal portfolio construction strategy periodically. Doing so ensures that our quantitative methodology stays calibrated to the highest performing portfolios. Here, we discuss the key findings from this recent analysis.

Backtesting methodology

Our backtesting methodology follows the same approach we used in our previous backtesting analysis. The key distinction now is our time period begins in 2014 and runs through April of 2021. Also, we focused on one-month holding periods this time. Why? Based on our previous results, we found holding periods between 1-3 months had little impact on returns.

Backtesting ETF results over a longer-term

Firstly, the chart below shows the result of changing the duration of the sampling period on the out-of-sample returns. Note that there are two local maximums, with the first occurring and the 6-9 months, but a second more substantial maximum occurring at about 39 and 45 months.

Annualized returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com
Annualized returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com

However, when a risk-adjusted return is considered, we can improve this calibration. In the next figure, we show the annualized return divided by the annualized volatility. Thus, it’s clear that the 39 month sample period is superior with this measure for the moderate and aggressive portfolios. For the conservative portfolios, there is only a slight degradation in risk-adjusted return over these 7+ years of backtesting.

Annualized returns / volatility from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com
Risk-adjusted returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com

Backtesting ETF results over a shorter term

We also backtested our quantitative strategy over a shorter interval of the last 15 months, from January 2020, through April 2021. Ideally, our backtesting results over the long-term, shown above, should agree with this shorter time frame. And, in fact, they generally do.

Annualized returns and risk-adjusted returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com
Annualized returns and risk-adjusted returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com

Once again, with the slight exception of the conservative strategy, the 36-39 month sample size provided the largest annualized returns and risk-adjusted returns.

Key takeaways

  • Backtesting provides an estimate on how our quantitative strategy would have performed based on historical time periods.
  • The best calibration for the sample period occurs around 39 months based on both absolute return and risk-adjusted return.
  • Longer-term and shorter-term backtesting provided similar calibration results.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Step-up in cost basis on inherited ETFs may soon change

The new proposal called the “American Families Plan” could end the step-up in cost basis for inherited assets. But, what does this mean for ETF investors? In this post, we discuss some of the key details of this proposed plan. This post is also a reminder to our premium subscribers that the May portfolios are now available.

How have inherited ETFs been taxed up to now?

ETFs owned by retirees typically reside in one of three different kinds of accounts. The Secure Act changed the rules for assets in retirement accounts, like IRAs. I published an article about the reduced benefit of the stretch provision in IRAs recently. In summary, non-spouse beneficiaries must now draw down their IRA assets within 10 years. Previously, beneficiaries could limit their withdrawals to Required Minimum Distributions.

However, the American Families Plan proposes new rules on ETFs inherited from a retiree’s taxable account. Currently, an heir enjoys a full step-up in cost basis on inherited ETFs residing in a taxable account, meaning the heir could immediately sell the ETF and not owe any capital gains tax. For example, suppose a retiree purchased $100,000 of SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF (ticker: SPY) on April 30, 2001, and reinvested all dividends for the next 20 years. On April 30, 2021, the investment would be worth approximately $484,000, not including any taxes due on the dividends generated by holding this ETF.

Growth of a $100,000 investment in the SPDR S*P 500 Index ETF (ticker SPY). Source: www.etfreplay.com
20 years of growth of a $100,000 investment in the SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF (ticker SPY). Source: www.etfreplay.com

Selling appreciated ETFs under this new plan

If the retiree sells this ETF investment prior this his or her death, capital gains would be owed on it up to 20% of the $384,000 gain, or $76,800. However, if the retiree passes away, an heir could sell it immediately and not pay any capital gains taxes. The heir received a step-up in cost basis. The new basis is assigned to the day the retiree passed away. However, under the new plan, this step–up is removed, and replaced by a $1,000,000 exemption. So, in the previous example, the heir would not owe any additional taxes. However, as larger sums of ETFs assets are bequeathed, an heir may owe taxes up to the 39.6% rate. And, there is still the estate tax that may apply if the retiree has more than $11.7 million of assets at death for 2021.

Will this plan pass congress?

No one knows yet what will eventually be passed by congress, so it is likely too early to start making any changes to a retiree’s estate. Time will tell how this may or may not impact your ETF assets passed to your heirs.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Value or Growth ETFs?

Investors continue to debate the benefits of value versus growth investing. The recent rotation into value stocks has only heightened this discussion. But, what is the difference between these two investment approaches when using ETFs?

photo of person holding ceramic mug
Photo by Anna Nekrashevich on Pexels.com

How a firm uses its earnings

While there can be many ways to categorize an ETF as a “growth”, one very simple approach is to look at what the firms in the ETF do with their earnings. Businesses like banks, utilities, and well-established firms like Disney or Johnson & Johnson generally pay a dividend. Back in the days of high-priced commissions to buy and sell an ETF, these dividends were very convenient, because they provided cash to investors without requiring them to sell a portion of their shares. Of course, with most brokers providing $0 commission trades, this aspect of dividends is less compelling. Perhaps more importantly though, firms issue dividends when they prefer to return some earnings to the shareholder, rather than reinvesting it into the business.

Growth companies and dividends

Alternatively, most growth companies see that their earnings could be better used if reinvested in the firm. Reinvestment can take the form of a new production facility, research & development, or others. Technology stocks are most often referred to as growth stocks due to their often relentless pursuit of innovation. Notable examples of growth companies are Apple Inc., Microsoft, and Tesla.

What is a better investment?

The debate between value and growth investing appears never-ending. Consider the last 3 years of investment in the Vanguard Large Cap Growth and Value ETFs (tickers: VUG and VTV). For reference, the S&P 500 ETF from iShares (ticker: IVV) also appears, which is a blend of both kinds of stocks.

Three year of total return of large cap growth, value and the S&P 500. Source: www.ETFReplay.com
Three year total return of large cap growth, large cap value and the S&P 500. Source: www.ETFReplay.com

From this chart, the growth ETF outperformed the value ETF over the last three years by greater than a factor of two, while producing little additional volatility. However, so far in 2021, this value ETF performed better than the growth ETF by about 5%, as shown below. Additionally, this value ETF achieved this outperformance with lower volatility.

2021 year to date total return of large cap growth, value and the S&P 500. Source: www.ETFReplay.com
2021 year to date total return of large cap growth, value and the S&P 500. Source: www.ETFReplay.com

Diversify the effect away

Not sure if value or growth is right for you? A simple way to avoid this debate is to diversify into both growth and value simultaneously. By investing in an S&P 500 index ETF, you also get access to a single investment that is extremely liquid and very cost-efficient.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Risk-seeking investors and the first quarter of 2021

There was plenty of risk-seeking in the first quarter of 2021. So, how did the stock and bond market respond?

A Unique Quarter

This recent Wall Street Journal article summarized this first quarter well. The author identified the following contributors to recent market behavior due to risk-seeking investors.

  1. Meme stocks
  2. Interest rates
  3. Tech rotation

Meme stocks and the Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO)

The most popular “meme” stock was GameStop Corp. for risk-seeking investors. But, what is a meme stock? This source describes it as a stock that exhibits rapid price growth that is popular among millennials. Meme stocks can also be categorized by high volatility, fueled by the so-called Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO) and panic selling. Time will tell if this category of stocks becomes more formalized, as many in the workforce return to their offices, thereby limiting their trading time. Of course, the effect of social media on stock trading isn’t likely to go away anytime soon.

A new trend in interest rates?

The other big news in the first quarter was the increase in interest rates. Long-term bond yields increased in February and March, after starting the year at 0.917%.

U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note Yield in First Quarter of 2021. Source: MarketWatch.com
U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note Yield in First Quarter of 2021. Source: MarketWatch.com

By the end of the first quarter of 2021, the U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note yield rose to 1.745%. As we wrote about before, the price of a bond decreases when yields rise. Consequently, the iShares Core Total US Bond ETF fell, to a year-to-date loss of 3.4%.

Total Return of iShares Core Total US Bond ETF, First Quarter of 2021. Source: ETFReplay.com
Total Return of iShares Core Total US Bond ETF, First Quarter of 2021. Source: ETFReplay.com

Tech Rotation

The first quarter was also characterized by about a 5% return difference between the Dow and Nasdaq indices. For instance, Exxon Mobil Corp. is up 35% this year, while Amazon and Apple have lost 5% and 7.9%, respectively. Of course, no one knows if this rotation out of tech and into energy is a new trend or just a reaction to markets anticipating a future with more energy consumption due to increased commuting. But, these recent changes have been incorporated into our portfolio construction process to produce an update to our free and premium portfolios. We encourage you to log in to see how these ETF portfolios changed due to the latest market dynamics.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.