Mitigating the effect of the Widow’s Penalty

During our webinar earlier this year, we highlighted one of the retirement income challenges called “The Widow’s Penalty”. This situation occurs when the surviving spouse is filing taxes as a single, instead of married filing jointly. In this post, we elaborate on the effect of this penalty on a fictitious couple we call John and Jane and show that tax-efficient retirement income can help mitigate its effect.

Case Study for John and Jane and the widow’s penalty

The bulleted list here summarizes John and Jane’s situation at the start of their retirement.

  • John and Jane retired this year in a community property state.   
  • John is 65 and has a life expectancy of 80.  Jane is 62 and has a life expectancy of 82. 
  • Their after-tax retirement income needs are $150,000 per year, reduced to $140,000 per year for the surviving spouse. (Today’s dollars)
  • Both have RMDs starting at age 72. 
  • Their heir’s marginal income tax rate is 25%.
  • John and Jane both have retirement assets tax-deferred ($800k, $100k) and tax-exempt accounts ($400k, $50k). John owns a taxable account valued at $1M with a cost basis of $300k in stocks and $272k in bonds.
  • Their asset allocation is 60%/40% stock/bonds in all accounts, and they increase bond allocation by 1% each year. 
  • John and Jane have annual pension income starting at age 65 of $18,500 each, and social security income starting at age 67 of $11,000 each.

As we showed in our previous post, if Jane is the surviving spouse, she can realize an additional 0.55% of investment return by drawing down from a mix of taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-exempt accounts. But, can this benefit still be realized if Jane lives longer?

Tax efficiency for a longer-living surviving spouse

In the example above, Jane lived for five years as a widow so needed to file her taxes as a single. Re-running our retirement income calculator and increasing Jane’s retirement horizon yields the following results.

Widow's penalty and opportunity for tax-efficient retirement income
Widow’s penalty and opportunity for tax-efficient retirement income

So, these results show that Jane can still increase the inheritance for her heirs if she lives up to 15 years as a widow. If she lives 25 years as a widow, she will exhaust all of her savings but will be able to increase her portfolio longevity by 3.5 years. Either of these situations is possible by not following the common rule for retirement account drawdowns but instead using optimal account drawdown decisions.

Want to see how the widow’s penalty may affect your retirement plan? We invite you to try out our calculator to see how your heir’s inheritance or your portfolio longevity may improve!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs

Cryptocurrency in 2022

It has been a very difficult year for cryptocurrency investors. Here, we will discuss the recent trend of cryptocurrency returns. Also, we will highlight the current cost of cryptocurrency mining, and share some thoughts on the future of this asset.

Cryptocurrency returns in 2022

Year-to-date returns of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the first ETF that tracks bitcoin futures (ticker: BITO) appear below. Like the stock and bond markets, all three of these assets lost value in 2022. Also, in our previous post on the risks of cryptocurrencies, the volatility of all of these cryptocurrency assets was significantly higher than the long-term historical norm of 15-20% for the S&P 500.

Total returns for the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), the Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETHE) and the first ETF linked to bitcoin futures BITO.
Total returns for the  Grayscale Bitcoin Trust  (GBTC), the Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETHE), and the first ETF linked to bitcoin futures BITO.

Bitcoin miners

Like oil, natural gas, and precious metals, there is a cost to “mine” bitcoin. Economic theory for commodities suggests that, when demand is constant, rising prices should increase production, since even less efficient miners can operate profitably. However, as prices drop, less efficient producers will exit, and less production of a commodity will occur, thereby stabilizing prices. That may be occurring now, as the price to mine one bitcoin is in the $20,000 to $34,000 range. As of July 31, 2022, the price of one bitcoin was within this range, with a value of $23,819.

Production cost of bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency. Source: TradingView
Bitcoin production cost. Source: TradingView

The Future of Cryptocurrency

The future of cryptocurrency remains uncertain. However, few expect these new innovations in decentralized finance to go away. Instead, we may see longer-term price stabilization, as the investment in mining produces enough cryptocurrency to satisfy demand. Such price stabilization may not entice investors seeking outsize returns but could help cryptocurrency gain wider acceptance if its volatility can also be reduced.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs

Mid-year review of stock-based ETFs

With the 1st half of 2022 now behind us, we devote this post to a mid-year review of ETFs in a variety of stock sectors. We also highlight some recent research on sectors that have historically held up well during periods of high inflation, and the benefit of time horizon when investing in stocks. We hope you find this mid-year review helpful!

Record-breaking 1st half of 2022

According to this MarketWatch article, the S&P 500 recorded its steepest 1st-half year loss in over 50 years. But, remember that the S&P 500 is a broad-based index consisting of many different companies across a variety of industries. In fact, there are 11 sectors in the S&P 500, which in order of size (and an ETF to represent them) are:

  • Information Technology (XLK)
  • Health Care (XLV)
  • Financials (XLF)
  • Consumer Discretionary (XLY)
  • Communication Services (XTL)
  • Industrials (XLI)
  • Consumer Staples (XLP)
  • Energy (XLE)
  • Utilities (XLU)
  • Real Estate (IYR)
  • Materials (XLB)

Mid-year review of best and worst performing sector ETFs

The chart below sorts the total return for the 11 ETFs identified above for 2022. As can be seen here, the biggest gains were among the energy sector (XLE) and the worst in consumer discretionary (XLY). Over this same period, the S&P 500 total return, measured by the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (ticker: IVV) was -19.2%. Also, note that the energy sector was the only ETF here that saw a positive return, which is not surprising given the war in Ukraine and its impact on supply in the energy sector.

Mid-year review of returns from 11 sector-ETFs in the S&P 500 Index
Mid-year review of returns from 11 sector-ETFs in the S&P 500 Index

Where will stocks go from here and what to do about it?

Given the current high inflation rates, Derek Horstmeyer at George Mason University recently showed the following “inflation fighters” in his June 5th Wall Street Journal Article.

Best performing sectors during periods of high inflation. Source: Derek Horstmeyer
Best performing sectors during periods of high inflation. Source: Derek Horstmeyer

Of course, the most prudent course of action may be to simply do nothing based on this mid-year review. Given longer investment horizons, the stock market is less likely to suffer losses. Based on Bank of America research, the chart below supports this fact.

But, as this article notes, behavioral economists know that the pain of loss is greater than the pleasure of gains. So, the 2nd half of this year remains quite uncertain, as market volatility remains elevated.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs

Tax-efficient retirement and upcoming webinar

Greetings ETFMathGuy subscribers! In this post, I will introduce you to our updated interactive calculator for tax-efficient retirement planning.

tax-efficient investing with the Optimal Retirement Income Calculator by ETFMathGuy
Optimal Retirement Income Calculator by ETFMathGuy
Note:  This post has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.

Tax-Efficient Retirement

We moved the retirement income calculator location on our site. Updated for 2022 tax law, it provides insights into the following questions:

  • How long will my portfolio support my annual after-tax retirement income needed to support discretionary and non-discretionary expenses?
  • How much will my heir or favorite charitable organization receive?
  • What will my future tax liabilities look like?

We still assume a mixture of tax-efficient investing in stock and bond ETFs, like IVV and AGG. Specifically, we assumed ETF stock investments generate qualified dividends and ETF bond investments generate dividends taxed as ordinary income. Of course, these assumption are only relevant to taxable account assets held by a retiree. Retiree’s may incur income taxes when they withdraw assets from tax-deferred accounts, like 401(k)s and rollover IRAs funded with pre-tax dollars. Tax-exempt accounts (like Roth IRAs) are generally not subject to any tax if withdrawn after age 59 1/2. The image below summarizes how we modeled different retirement income sources and how they contribute to after-tax income.

Modeling Retirement Taxes in Our Retirement Income Calculator

What’s new?

We now offer the ability to expedite calculations by storing profile data, such as month and day of birth to determine your first Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age, and state of residence for community property tax calculations. You can also find a “subscribe” button below your profile data. So, if after running the retirement calculator and viewing results from the Common Rule, you must subscribe if you are interested in seeing the details on the Modified Common Rule or Optimal Rule. For example, if you run the retirement income calculator with its default values, you will see the following information about your plan. But, only paid subscribers will be able to view future optimal drawdown decisions and other supporting information.

Default Retirement Income Calculator Results and Improvements Based on a Optimal Rule

Please note: You will need to register with us here for free and then confirm your email address with our new system. We have not transferred any previously provided email addresses, instead using them solely for distribution of this periodic commentary. We also plan for many additional upgrades and new calculators this year, as we discussed in our last post, or as you can see on our new home page.

Upcoming Webinar for Individual Investors and Financial Advisors

I will be presenting an in-depth review of this new online software, including details on how it is based on my latest research on tax-efficient investing, on Tuesday, March 1st at 9 am Pacific Time, 12:00 noon Eastern Time. Individual investors can register here, and financial advisors can register here. If you are unable to make the presentation, you are welcome to download my presentation here.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs

Happy new year!

Happy new year from ETFMathGuy! In this post, we will provide some updates to our plans for 2022.

happy birthday to you wall decor
Photo by Anna Tarazevich on Pexels.com

New Priorities

As 2022 begins, we decided to reset our priorities for this website. Up until now, we provided the following services to our subscribers.

For 2022, we’ve decided that the cost to produce and maintain the free and premium portfolios was simply too high. We also recognized that, while these portfolios did exceed their objective in 2020, they did not in 2021. All premium subscribers will receive a pro-rated refund of their subscription payments shortly. In the meantime, free and premium subscribers can now access the final monthly portfolios, based on data through December 31, 2021.

Coming soon

So, after receiving very positive praise on our retirement calculator, we’ve decided to make improving it a priority. Also, thanks to significant feedback from individual investors and financial services professionals, below is a list of features we hope to provide in the near future:

  • Projection of retirement assets at beginning of retirement for pre-retiree planning
  • Optimized social security starting age for single or married couples
  • Medicare Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount  (IRMAA) tax
  • State taxes, as applicable
  • 3.8% medicare surtax
  • Roth conversions using either IRA or taxable account funds
  • Robustness checks with an automated sensitivity analysis for selectable uncertain variables
  • Risk assessment with simulation of uncertain stock market returns, life exptancy, after-tax income needs, and others
  • Real estate income and residual value
  • Support for Financial Independence, Retiree Early (FIRE)
  • Online storage of previous results for future reference

Of course, our retirement calculator already has many features discussed in the FAQ and listed at the top of the calculator. Also, if you are interested in greater details, you are welcome to download this whitepaper that we developed recently to describe the current model in greater depth.

We hope you have a wonderful 2022!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in tax-efficient investing with ETFs

Bitcoin ETFs may arrive soon, but returns may surprise ETF investors

Investor interest in cryptocurrency and bitcoin remains high. This week, ETF investors may see the first futures-based bitcoin ETFs. Here, we discuss the introduction of bitcoin ETFs, and why they may not perform as ETF investors expect.

person putting bitcoin in a piggy bank
Photo by Alesia Kozik on Pexels.com

Set to debut this week and next week

According to this ETF.com article, October 18th could be the first effective date that two bitcoin ETFs are set to debut. And, another bitcoin ETF could become available a week later, on October 23rd, and a fourth potentially available on October 25th. But, its important to note that each of these ETFs depend on futures contracts for their bitcoin exposure. Therefore, none of them hold bitcoin to provide direct exposure to the spot market. Instead, the most direct exposure for investors seeking bitcoin remains the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), which typically trades at a premium. In fact, we wrote about the risks and taxation of GBTC earlier this year.

What can happen with futures-based ETFs?

Sadly, futures-based ETFs can often not match the corresponding price performance of the spot market. For example, ETF investors wishing exposure to West Texas Intermediate crude oil price changes could buy the United States Oil Fund ETF (ticker: USO) Unfortunately, a phenomenan called “contango” can occur when the price of the futures contract exceeds the expected future spot price. So, the fund loses money when it replaces expiring contracts with near-term future contracts. Consequently, over time, futures-based ETFs tend to underperform the spot price market.

“These kinds of vehicles are primarily meant to be used by active traders to hedge or short positions.  They are not meant as long-term buy and hold vehicles.”

source: CNBC.com.

A better way to track bitcoin in an ETF

Fortunately, there is some good news about bitcoin ETFs. Greyscale has indicated it may convert its current bitcoin fund into an ETF. If they do, this ETF’s investment returns wouldn’t be subject to contango, and won’t suffer from the return drag of futures-based bitcoin ETFs. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) current commissioner has stated he prefers approving ETFs backed by bitcoin futures. So, ETF investors interested in bitcoin may wish to continue to wait or seek alternatives outside the ETF space.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.

Backtesting for 2021 and ETFMathGuy portfolio enhancements

Due to portfolio performance not meeting our recent expectations, we revisited our backtesting results from August 2018 and produced important new insights and portfolio construction enhancements. We discovered that a longer sample period, identified previously, no longer applied. The image below shows that a three-month sample period produced the best returns from January 2020 to August 27, 2021. Each point on this line plot represents annualized backtested performance for 19 monthly portfolios over this testing period.

Backtesting for 2021 to find the optimal sample period (months) for ETFMathGuy Portfolio Construction
Backtesting for 2021 to find the optimal sample period (months) for ETFMathGuy Portfolio Construction

What performance predictions occurred with this shorter sample period?

Using this shorter sample period, we produced the plot below of total return since January of 2020. We chose this time period to include the full pre and post-term effects of the coronavirus on the world economy. In addition, and based on subscriber feedback, we now exclude ETFs that issue K-1 tax forms to investors. We made this decision because these 22 ETFs had a marginal effect on backtested performance that used over 1,000 other ETFs that do not issue K-1s. We also increased our ETF filter threshold of median volume to improve liquidity for future portfolios that will likely have a higher turnover rate. The consequences of these decisions on backtested performance appear below.

Backtested Returns from 2020-2021 of the ETFMathGuy Optimal Portfolios
Backtested Returns from 2020-2021 of the ETFMathGuy Optimal Portfolios

Future ETFMathGuy portfolios

Given the improvement potential identified from this updated backtesting for 2021, all portfolios published in September 2021 and later will follow these updated findings. This update for the September portfolios will likely indicate a significant change from the August portfolios. However, future monthly portfolios will change less significantly. So, we encourage subscribers to log in and see the September ETFMathGuy portfolios that are based on this evidence-based analysis.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.

Recap of the first half of 2021

Greeting ETFMathGuy subscribers! This post is a reminder that the latest free and premium optimal portfolios are now available for your review. So, please log in and see how the latest market conditions have affected these ETF portfolios. To begin, we discuss value versus growth ETFs and recent trends in their returns.

Recent returns on value investing leveling off?

A few months ago, we wrote about how value-driven ETFs returned about 5% more in the first quarter than growth ETFs. Revisiting the returns of the ETFs IVV, VUG, and VTV for the first half of 2021 shows this gap has shrunk to 3% after growing to more than 10%. In fact, as the chart here shows, the value ETF is below its early May high, while the growth ETF appears to have begun a new upward trend.

Total returns of value and growth ETFs.
The total return of value and growth ETFs in the first half of 2021. Source: www.ETFReplay.com

Is the relationship between value and growth ETFs typical?

The relationship between two variables can be directly measured using correlation which varies between 1 and -1. So, a correlation of 1 between two investment returns indicates their returns are identical. Traditionally, the correlation between value and growth investments was around 75%. However, as this Wall Street Journal article highlights, the current correlation between growth and value is now below 25%.

Correlation between value and growth returns.
Source: Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2021, by James Mackintosh

Performance of the ETFMathGuy Premium Portfolios

Based on actual investment performance, the risk and return of the moderate and aggressive portfolios over the last 18 months appear below. Consequently, this period includes all of the calendar year 2020, and the first half of 2021.

ModerateAggressiveS&P 500 (IVV)
volatility (risk, annualized)19.5%22.5%21.2%
total return23.9%32.7%36.4%
Annualized risk and total return of the ETFMathGuy portfolios, 2020-2021 (18 months).

We will continue to update our ETFMathGuy portfolios with current market conditions using our updated backtesting calibration results. So, time will tell if value ETF investing continues to outperform growth ETF investing.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.

Backtesting ETF portfolios

Backtesting ETF portfolios is a very important part of validating any investment strategy that uses them. At ETFMathGuy, we backtest our optimal portfolio construction strategy periodically. Doing so ensures that our quantitative methodology stays calibrated to the highest performing portfolios. Here, we discuss the key findings from this recent analysis.

Backtesting methodology

Our backtesting methodology follows the same approach we used in our previous backtesting analysis. The key distinction now is our time period begins in 2014 and runs through April of 2021. Also, we focused on one-month holding periods this time. Why? Based on our previous results, we found holding periods between 1-3 months had little impact on returns.

Backtesting ETF results over a longer-term

Firstly, the chart below shows the result of changing the duration of the sampling period on the out-of-sample returns. Note that there are two local maximums, with the first occurring and the 6-9 months, but a second more substantial maximum occurring at about 39 and 45 months.

Annualized returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com
Annualized returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com

However, when a risk-adjusted return is considered, we can improve this calibration. In the next figure, we show the annualized return divided by the annualized volatility. Thus, it’s clear that the 39 month sample period is superior with this measure for the moderate and aggressive portfolios. For the conservative portfolios, there is only a slight degradation in risk-adjusted return over these 7+ years of backtesting.

Annualized returns / volatility from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com
Risk-adjusted returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com

Backtesting ETF results over a shorter term

We also backtested our quantitative strategy over a shorter interval of the last 15 months, from January 2020, through April 2021. Ideally, our backtesting results over the long-term, shown above, should agree with this shorter time frame. And, in fact, they generally do.

Annualized returns and risk-adjusted returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com
Annualized returns and risk-adjusted returns from backtesting differing sample sizes. Source: ETFMathGuy.com

Once again, with the slight exception of the conservative strategy, the 36-39 month sample size provided the largest annualized returns and risk-adjusted returns.

Key takeaways

  • Backtesting provides an estimate on how our quantitative strategy would have performed based on historical time periods.
  • The best calibration for the sample period occurs around 39 months based on both absolute return and risk-adjusted return.
  • Longer-term and shorter-term backtesting provided similar calibration results.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.

Step-up in cost basis on inherited ETFs may soon change

The new proposal called the “American Families Plan” could end the step-up in cost basis for inherited assets. But, what does this mean for ETF investors? In this post, we discuss some of the key details of this proposed plan. This post is also a reminder to our premium subscribers that the May portfolios are now available.

How have inherited ETFs been taxed up to now?

ETFs owned by retirees typically reside in one of three different kinds of accounts. The Secure Act changed the rules for assets in retirement accounts, like IRAs. I published an article about the reduced benefit of the stretch provision in IRAs recently. In summary, non-spouse beneficiaries must now draw down their IRA assets within 10 years. Previously, beneficiaries could limit their withdrawals to Required Minimum Distributions.

However, the American Families Plan proposes new rules on ETFs inherited from a retiree’s taxable account. Currently, an heir enjoys a full step-up in cost basis on inherited ETFs residing in a taxable account, meaning the heir could immediately sell the ETF and not owe any capital gains tax. For example, suppose a retiree purchased $100,000 of SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF (ticker: SPY) on April 30, 2001, and reinvested all dividends for the next 20 years. On April 30, 2021, the investment would be worth approximately $484,000, not including any taxes due on the dividends generated by holding this ETF.

Growth of a $100,000 investment in the SPDR S*P 500 Index ETF (ticker SPY). Source: www.etfreplay.com
20 years of growth of a $100,000 investment in the SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF (ticker SPY). Source: www.etfreplay.com

Selling appreciated ETFs under this new plan

If the retiree sells this ETF investment prior this his or her death, capital gains would be owed on it up to 20% of the $384,000 gain, or $76,800. However, if the retiree passes away, an heir could sell it immediately and not pay any capital gains taxes. The heir received a step-up in cost basis. The new basis is assigned to the day the retiree passed away. However, under the new plan, this stepup is removed, and replaced by a $1,000,000 exemption. So, in the previous example, the heir would not owe any additional taxes. However, as larger sums of ETFs assets are bequeathed, an heir may owe taxes up to the 39.6% rate. And, there is still the estate tax that may apply if the retiree has more than $11.7 million of assets at death for 2021.

Will this plan pass congress?

No one knows yet what will eventually be passed by congress, so it is likely too early to start making any changes to a retiree’s estate. Time will tell how this may or may not impact your ETF assets passed to your heirs.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.