Tag: portfolios

Posted on

Happy New Year from ETFMathGuy!

Happy New Year! To start this year, we made some significant updates to our services. Hopefully, you will find these updates useful as you evaluate your ETF investments.

New Menu Options To Access Optimal Portfolios for 2020

We have reorganized the menu at the top of ETFMathGuy.com to provide access to the 2019 and 2020 portfolios. You can still find them under the heading “Current Portfolios“.

We have also created two options for the 2020 portfolios. The first option is labeled “Free Optimal Portfolios for 2020”, and is accessible to all free subscribers of ETFMathGuy. It provides optimal portfolios generated each month using only Vanguard ETFs. So, please check out the January portfolios posted earlier today, and also now available to download for offline review. These portfolios are an excellent way to minimize expense ratios associated with ETFs, while keeping the number of ETFs in a portfolio to a minimum.

New menu options to access the 2019 and 2020 Optimal Portfolios
New menu options to access the 2019 and 2020 Optimal Portfolios

The other option is the “Premium Optimal Portfolios for 2020“. This option takes advantage of other parts of the financial market that Vanguard ETFs don’t reach, and analyzes over 2,000 commission-free ETFs. As a result, these portfolios are only accessible to premium subscribers. Like the free portfolios, they are also available for download.

All 2020 portfolios are available to download as PDF files.
All 2020 portfolios are now available to download as PDF files.

New Subscription Options

If you are interested in accessing the premium portfolios, we provide two payment options. As shown on the “Join Us” page, you can select either monthly or annual billing. Also, we accept credit card payments through our payment processor Stripe.

Price: $9.95 / month

Want to save over 30% on your monthly subscription each year? Then, consider paying once per year!

Price: $79.95 / year

Don’t want to upgrade your subscription? Well, that is not a problem. You can continue receiving our periodic commentary, access the free portfolios, and continue to test out our new interactive retirement income calculator.

Wishing you a wonderful 2020!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.

Posted on

December 2019 optimal portfolios and ETF industry consolidation

The December 2019 optimal portfolios are now available to ETFMathGuy subscribers. So, please log in and select your discount broker to see the effect of current market conditions on your optimal portfolios. In this post, we will also discuss some consolidation in the ETF industry and how it may affect your brokerage accounts.

ETFs can be a low-cost way to invest in the stock and bond markets. But, consolidation is occurring with ETF brokers.
Source: WSJ.com

Schwab announces its purchase of TD Ameritrade

The announcement of a consolidation in the discount brokerage industry occurred in November. The $0 commission fee war started recently likely contributed to this industry change . This news is especially problematic for ETrade, who manages 5.3 million brokerage accounts. By comparison, Fidelity has nearly 30 million brokerage accounts and the combined Schwab and Ameritrade would have 24 million. Given that discount brokers increase profitability with the scale of their operations, ETrade could struggle in the coming years. Or, put another way, commission-free ETFs are reducing revenue of discount brokers. There is interest at ETrade for an acquisition, but no firms have stepped forward yet.

“If you put your hand up and say you’re on sale, and nobody shows up, that can be seen as a negative,”

Devin Ryan, an analyst at JMP Securities, discussing ETrade’s interest in being acquired.

Should you switch to a different broker?

A recent review of online brokers put ETrade in 4th place. There was a 3-way tie for 1st place between Schwab, Ameritrade and Fidelity. Vanguard appeared in 5th place. Our opinion is that the subtle differences between brokers may be indistinguishable to many retail investors. We believe costs should be paramount as they create a drag on investment returns. For this reason, we recommend that if you are already with one of these five brokers, it probably isn’t worth the time to make a change. However, you may wish to revisit this decision if industry consolidation continues and fees change.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

More ETFs trading commission-free

The year of 2019 has seen a dramatic shift in the costs to trade ETFs. There are now four discount brokers who offer nearly all ETFs commission-free, including Ameritrade, Fidelity, Schwab and Vanguard. But, as we’ve discussed previously, investment returns depend on another cost too. We discuss this other cost here, and suggest alternatives to help minimize it.

How many commission-free ETFs are there now?

There are many ETFs available today covering broad and narrow aspects of the market. According to my favorite screener at ETF.com, and excluding leveraged and inverse ETFs, there are 2,052. That is a lot of choices for any investor to consider. Here at ETFMathGuy, we prefer optimal portfolio construction. That is, selecting ETFs that compliment one another in a diversified portfolio. Prior to this construction, we also screen ETFs to ensure each portfolio avoids ETFs with (i) low volumes and (ii) short track records.

The other cost: the bid-ask spread

The hidden cost of buying and selling an ETF is the bid-ask spread. So, investors should conduct some due diligence to reduce this cost whenever possible. Based on the latest data from ETF.com, we constructed the chart below. As it shows, thinly traded ETFs or ETFs that have less-liquid underlying securities still persist in about 10% of ETFs available today. Fortunately, a little more than half of ETFs have a bid-ask spread under 0.15%.

Number of ETFs and their bid-ask spreads, as of November 2019.
Source: ETF.com’s ETF Screener & Database

Conclusions

Commission-free ETFs are good news, as they reduce the cost of investing in ETFs. However, care should be taken to avoid other costs, like the bid-ask spread. To help avoid this cost, investors should seek more liquid ETFs with lower bid-ask spreads, or find ways to trade less frequently. In any case, commission-free doesn’t mean there are no transaction costs, and investors would be wise to choose their ETFs with care.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

November 2019 Portfolios and a Thank You to our Subscribers

The November 2019 optimal portfolios are now available to ETFMathGuy subscribers. So, please log in and select your discount broker to see the effect of current market conditions on your optimal portfolios. In this post, we will also discuss some changes to ETFMathGuy.com for 2020, and a special offer for current subscribers.

Changes coming to ETFMathGuy.com for 2020

2019 has been a good year for ETFMathGuy.com. We have seen significant growth of investors interested in optimal portfolios using ETFs. Our subscriber base has also grown substantially, but so has our cost of running this service. So, beginning in January of 2020, we will be making changes to our subscription program. Subscription pricing will become as follows:

$9.95 / month or $79.95 / year for individuals

If you are a financial adviser and wish to continue using our portfolios to help guide investment decisions for your clients, please contact us for institutional pricing. This pricing will apply to portfolios we produce each month from the following brokers’ commission-free ETFs: Ameritrade, ETrade, Fidelity and Schwab

As a “thank you” for anyone who starts a free subscription before the end of the year, will will provide discounted subscription fees. So, please share this opportunity with other like-minded ETF investors you may know, and stay tuned for more details!

Continuing benefits of a free subscription

We realize that some of you may not want to pay for a subscription. So, for those who don’t upgrade, your free subscription will continue. Your free subscription will include access to the Vanguard optimal portfolios. It will also include email updates on our periodic commentary on market conditions and trends in ETFs.

Vanguard offers commission-free ETFs.
Optimal portfolios using Vanguard Commission-free ETFs will continue to be available without a monthly or annual subscription fee.

Thank you all for an amazing first year of ETFMathGuy!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Is direct indexing better than buying an ETF?

Direct indexing may be gaining popularity soon, thanks to a continued fee war between several large brokerages. Both Schwab and Ameritrade recently announced commission-free stock trades, in addition to their commission-free ETF trades. This may sound like an appealing alternative, but direct indexing is far from simple.

What is direct indexing?

Direct indexing creates a portfolio that tracks an index through buying individual stocks. So, in the case of the S&P 500, you would invest in common stock from the 500 companies that make up the index. By eliminating the commission for each trade, the cost barrier of buying and selling each stock goes down significantly. However, it still requires many trades. In the case of the S&P 500, there are actually 505 common stock listings for the 500 companies in the index. It turns out that a few companies, like Google, have two share classes. So, one could eliminate the expense ratio of 0.04% currently charged by the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (ticker: IVV). For a $100,000 portfolio, that is a savings of $40 a year. For portfolios of this size, I would argue that the convenience of trading a single ETF is worth $40 a year.

Tax benefits of direct indexing

When an investor builds a portfolio of common stock with direct indexing, they get more control over its holdings. While ETFs are known to be very tax efficient, tax loss harvesting is not possible at the individual security level. This benefit doesn’t make a difference in retirement accounts that aren’t paying taxes on selling stocks, but can be significant in taxable accounts for high income earners.

Conclusions

I am happy to see commissions for stock trades hitting $0, but I’m not convinced that for most investors, direct indexing makes sense. There is a cost savings, but the additional effort could be significant. And, if your larger investments are in tax-deferred or exempt retirement accounts, there aren’t any tax benefits available anyway. Tax loss harvesting appears to be the most compelling reason to direct index. It is most beneficial to individuals paying the highest marginal tax rates.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

September portfolios and year-to-date returns

The September 2019 optimal portfolios are now available to subscribers of ETFMathGuy. So, please log in and select your discount broker to see the effect of current market conditions on our optimal portfolios. In this post, we discuss the year-to-date returns of my personal account using the ETFMathGuy portfolios.

Year-to-date returns

Although there are still four months remaining in the year, I thought this would be a good time to talk about my year-to-date returns. I have personally been using the moderate risk level portfolios in my Fidelity brokerage account since the beginning of the year. Monthly returns, based on the balance in my account, appear below.

Monthly returns using commission-free Fidelity ETFs and the moderate ETFMathGuy risk level.
Monthly returns using commission-free Fidelity ETFs and the moderate ETFMathGuy risk level.

To better understand the returns in my account that maximizes return for a portfolio with volatility half-way between stocks and bonds, I created the next table. Here, you can see that the ETFMathGuy portfolio return so far in 2019 is 14.1%, with a monthly volatility of 2.1%. To one decimal place, the same volatility is seen if an investor had simply maintained a 50% stock and 50% bond fund, re-balanced each month. But, the 50/50 portfolio would have seen a return of only 13.7%

ETFMathGuy portfolio returns are higher than a 50/50 stock/bond portfolio, with the same volatility.
ETFMathGuy portfolio returns are higher than a 50/50 stock/bond portfolio, with the same volatility.

Key takeaways

The ETFMathGuy portfolios appear to be behaving as expected. That is, they have about the same amount of volatility as their benchmark. However, I realized an additional return of about 0.4% in my brokerage account. For a $100,000 portfolio, that is an additional gain of about $400. I will revisit my portfolio’s performance again at the end of the year, so please stay tuned!

The future of ETFMathGuy

For the near future, I will continue to provide the optimal portfolios without a fee. But, in the meantime, I decided to begin accepting donations, if you are so inclined. Please find the donate button at the bottom of the “Join Us” page. For your convenience, it also appears below.

Thanks for supporting ETFMathGuy!

Thank you all for your interest and support in 2019. I hope you all had a wonderful labor day weekend!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

August 2019 portfolios are now available based on our current low volatility markets

The August 2019 optimal portfolios are now available to subscribers of ETFMathGuy. So, please log in and select your discount broker to see the effect of current market conditions on our optimal portfolios. In this post, we highlight the effect of the recent low market volatility on portfolio turnover.

Low volatility is here, for now…

As discussed in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal article entitled “Markets are Eerily Quiet Right Now“, market volatility has been quite low recently. For the past 35 days, the S&P 500 hasn’t changed by more than 1%. Consequently, the August 2019 portfolios won’t differ much from the previous month. For instance, consider the Vanguard moderate portfolios generated over the past two months.

Vanguard optimal portfolios the Month of July, 2019, Moderate Risk Level
Vanguard optimal portfolios the Month of July, 2019, Moderate Risk Level
Vanguard optimal portfolios the Month of August, 2019, Moderate Risk Level
Vanguard optimal portfolios the Month of August, 2019, Moderate Risk Level

As these simpler portfolios demonstrate, low volatility produces less turnover. Here, none of the portfolio weights changed by more than a few percent.

Where will the stock and bond markets go from here?

Frankly, we don’t know, as we believe that markets are generally efficient. Market volatility will certainly return to a more typical level at some point in the future. But, when will this occur? Perhaps volatility will pick up when many professional traders return from summer vacation? Or, perhaps markets will stay quiet until the start of the next earnings season?

In any event, when market volatility does return, our monthly portfolio updates will pick up these dynamics and generate a new set of optimal portfolios. We hope you will stay tuned!

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Fundamentals of Fixed Income ETFs

A recent Wall Street Journal article nicely summarized the fundamentals that define fixed income ETFs. Understanding these fundamentals can be very helpful in using them in a portfolio seeking the stability of bonds.

Quality, maturity and pricing of Bond ETFs

Two fundamental components that define a fixed income ETF are credit quality and maturity. Remember that fixed income ETFs are a collection of individual bonds. Also, a bond is a loan with fixed payments. That is why bonds are often referred to as “fixed income” investments. Credit rating firms, like Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s, evaluate the riskiness of the loans. Maturity measures the time until the original loan amount is due.

So, there is a strong relationship between a bond’s yield and these two fundamental components. Generally speaking, when a bond is first created, yields are higher under either (i) a lower credit rating or (ii) longer maturity. Once a bond is issued and makes its way into a bond ETF, the price of the bond ETF can then change. But, the underlying bonds continue to issue a stream of constant payments. The only significant exception occurs when the corporation making the bond payments enters bankruptcy protection.

Consequently, prices tend to decrease when demand is low, and investors prefer riskier assets. Conversely, prices of fixed income ETFs generally go up when investors seek less risky assets.  Yields are then inversely related to bond prices, so higher prices lead to lower yields.

What else can affect a bond’s price?

Interest rates can also affect bond prices. Short term rates set by the federal funds rate appear in the image below. As this chart shows, short term rates continue to climb steadily. But, these rates remain below typical levels seen in the past 20 years.

Federal funds rate for the past 20 years.
Federal funds rate for the past 20 years.

So, are bonds a bad investment as short-term rates go up?

This is an important question with no easy answer. But, few would argue that a diversified portfolio benefits from having some bond investments. So, the question should be “what part of the bond market is most suitable to your goals? ” Given there are bond ETFs covering a wide range of maturities and riskiness, there is no shortage of fixed income ETFs for investors to pick from. To this end, we encourage you to subscribe to ETFMathGuy to see how we use a wide variety of commission-free bond ETFs in efficient portfolios.

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Opportunities from more commission-free ETFs

Earlier this month, Fidelity followed through on its promise made earlier in the year. They now offers over 500 commission-free ETFs. This increase puts them in 2nd place for most commission-free ETFs offered by the five discount brokers analyzed each month by ETFMathGuy. The leader is still Vanguard, with approximately 1,800. Our chart below shows the update for Fidelity’s offering, where the Vanguard count only represents Vanguard ETFs. (We will be updating our Vanguard database soon.)

Vanguard* count only includes Vanguard ETFs. Vanguard now offers approximately 1,800 ETFs commission-free.
Vanguard* count only includes Vanguard ETFs. Vanguard now offers approximately 1,800 ETFs commission-free.

What is the benefit of more commission-free ETFs in a portfolio?

The most obvious benefit is the opportunity to access portions of the market not previously available. I demonstrated this benefit in previously published research entitled “ETF trading strategies to enhance client wealth maximization“. Here at ETFMathGuy, we have seen these opportunities first hand in our optimal portfolios. Each month, we’ve developed portfolios based on the current number of ETFs offered by each discount broker. We have also calculated the expected return associated with these portfolios, and there appears to be a potential opportunity. When constructing portfolios with more ETFs available, we see in the figure below that expected returns generally improve. Note that the pair of dots next to the portfolios are the result of excluding commission-free municipal bonds when generating a portfolio suitable for an IRA.

Expected return of ETFMathGuy optimal portfolios tend to rise with more commission-free ETFs available

More commission-fee ETFs may not always be beneficial

This figure shows that having more options to invest can improve the likelihood of generating higher returns. But, the additional ETFs must be sufficiently different those that are already offered. They must also have the potential to generate higher returns. Ameritrade seems to be accomplishing the most with their approximately 300 ETFs. Conversely, ETrade offers many more ETFs than the 59 offered by Vanguard, but doesn’t appear to increase expected returns by much in the portfolios constructed by ETFMathGuy .

ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.
Posted on

Using diversification to deal with market volatility

A recent Wall Street Journal article discussed the behavioral aspects caused by market volatility. The article nicely summarizes the long term view of the market. Based on historical analysis, there is a 2% drop in the stock market every 33 trading days, on average. With the Dow at its current levels, that is a 520 point drop every 6 weeks or so.

If this amount of volatility is “keeping you up at night”, perhaps your portfolio isn’t properly diversified? I touched on diversification using bonds in my last post, and will discuss diversification more broadly now.

So, what is diversification?

Simply put, diversification is not allowing for concentrated positions in a portfolio. For example, if you have a portfolio of a single stock, this portfolio is not diversified. But, as more stock is added from different companies in different sectors, investors can often reduce portfolio risk. However, market risk remains, as shown below.

Increasing the number of stocks reduces risk, as measured by the standard deviations of periodic returns.
Increasing the number of stocks reduces risk, as measured by the standard deviations of periodic returns.

Going beyond market risk for wider diversification and reduced volatility

A simple approach to managing portfolio risk is through mutual funds or exchange traded funds. Both investment vehicles hold a basket of many securities, eliminating the need to hold individual stocks to properly diversify. Here at ETFMathGuy, we are advocates of ETFs (exchanged traded funds), because ETFs have better tax efficiency, (usually) lower expense ratios, and often trade commission-free.

Now, most individuals also invest outside the stock market. So, they seek diversification by investing in other asset classes too. For instance, bonds tend to “zig” when stocks “zag”. To see an example of this approach, consider the conservative Fidelity optimal portfolio by ETFMathGuy published for March 2019, and shown below.

Taxable portfolio using Fidelity commission-free ETFs reduces volatility

Assuming an investor buys-and-holds this portfolio from March 4, 2019 through May 21, 2019, the growth of $100 appears below. Notice that the large drop at the end of this time period. This volatility, shown in blue as the S&P 500 ETF (ticker: IVV), is largely unnoticeable in the ETFMathGuy optimal portfolio, shown in green.

Comparing volatility of the conservative ETFMathGuy optimal Fidelity portfolio to the S&P 500 ETF
Comparing volatility of the conservative ETFMathGuy optimal Fidelity portfolio to the S&P 500 ETF

Digging into the statistics reveals compelling information about the volatility. The annualized volatility over this period of the ETFMathGuy portfolio is 4.0% versus 11.0% for the S&P 500 ETF. Clearly, diversification across asset classes (like stocks and bonds) can be a very effective way to manage volatility.


ETFMathGuy is a subscription-based education service for investors interested in using commission-free ETFs in efficient portfolios.